Proposed Mount Pleasant Library Plans
FIRE SAFETY ISSUES


On June 2, 2010, Fire Chief Rubin and Fire Marshall Faust visited the Mount Pleasant Library. Upon review of DCPL's proposed expansion plans and ANC-1C's expert report put forward by Nichols Design Associates, Chief Rubin stated, "I do not see the need nor can I support this suggestion [fire access lane] as improving the fire operations and life safety requirements for any of the buildings that are adjacent to the library."

See the entire email from Chief Rubin here.

There are several problems with Chief Rubin's analysis:

  1. It has been more than two years since the devastating Deauville Apartment fire. It was an eight-alarm fire that destroyed two large buildings along the Mount Pleasant residential corridor. There has been no attempt that anyone is aware of to discuss how to prevent fires along this corridor since, despite the fact that DCPL's proposed Mount Pleasant Library plans will block yet another emergency access point off of Lamont Street. There has been no meaningful discussion among the apartment buildings about sprinkling these buildings. There has been no discussion about why DCFD could not readily get to the rear of the Deauville Apartment to douse the fire from the rear of the building. The stories of how the DCFD pulled hoses through the Park Marconi apartments has been quietly put under the table. Yet, Chief Rubin unequivocally says he cannot support the idea of exploring the use of a fire access lane behind the library so they could help save people and put out fires more easily along this dense residential corridor which will become denser with the expansion.

  2. Chief Rubin dismisses the idea of a fire lane per Appendix D of the International Fire Code because it has not been adopted by the DC Council. But he forgets to tell you that Appendix D is something that DCFEMS wants the Council to adopt as part of DC Code and that it carries the moral weight of what is viewed as safe building code at the international level. Just because these rules around fire access haven't yet been adopted by a belabored City Council, doesn't mean the City should not try to reach such internationally recognized safety benchmarks to provide the residents of Ward One as much emergency access as possible.

  3. The Nichols Design Associates Report and NDA Supplemental Report, clearly requests that Chief Rubin explain how response time will be affected if DCPL builds their proposed large expansion. Chief Rubin has not done this. In particular, the NDA Supplemental Report says,




  4. The NDA Report further goes on to refute what Chief Rubin states in his email, where that even buildings which are renovated should include a fire access lane as part of the construction plans, as shown below:



  5. Additionally, Chief Rubin did not contact any of the local ANC's who have expressed deep concern about the proposed plans so they could look at the site together. Chief Rubin fails to acknowledge his concerns from a year ago that the expansion will be quite close to the surrounding apartments. At that time, the Fire Chief said that the more distance there is between buildings, the less likely it becomes a fire that can jump the gap and burn other buildings, including the library. The proposed library expansion plans will bring the library less than twenty feet from the surrounding apartment buildings. See the video below.




  6. Further, Chief Rubin does not address how the proposed plans will totally eliminate an emergency access point from Lamont Street to the rear of the library and to the many apartments that exist along this residential corridor. Why is the Fire Chief ok with this plan especially given that DCFD refers to this Mount Pleasant and this area as a "trouble spot."


    Click for larger image

    click for larger image




  7. Why isn't the Chief lending suggestions at this point. In his email to CM Graham, Chief Rubin was quick not to support the idea of a fire lane, but by rejecting an idea he doesn't magically increase fire emergency access. The bottom-line is, we want our leaders to step up and show us how we can increase fire access to about one-thousand residents who live along the Mount Pleasant residential corridor, and we want this reflected in the proposed Mount Pleasant Library designs.

    For example, if we were to keep the accessibility ramp at the front of the library and place a fire plug at the end of a paved patio/roadway along the side of the library, then a fire pumper truck could drive in and access the water plug where hoses could be attached so to run down the back of this residential corridor to douse fires. This is seen below:



    Or better yet, we get the fire access lane that is required by International Fire Code which would allow fire ladder truck and pump access to help save residents in buildings taller than 30 feet and to douse fires using an aerial hose, as shown below:



SEE MORE FIRE SAFETY CONCERNS AND DETAILS ABOUT A FIRE LANE HERE